We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Are Cut Flowers Bad for the Environment?

Mary McMahon
Updated Jun 04, 2024
Our promise to you
All Things Nature is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All Things Nature, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Many people like to celebrate major holidays with lavish bouquets of cut flowers. As a result, the flower industry is booming, shipping hundreds of tons of them all over the world for sale in supermarkets and at florists. Consumers spend millions every year purchasing flowers and bringing them into their homes: and most consumers do not think about the environmental and social aspects of the industry. Several studies conducted in the late 1990s suggested that cut flowers had a serious environmental impact.

Most cut flowers are grown in South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia in large greenhouse environments staffed by underpaid, non-unionized workers. The greenhouses are carefully climate controlled to yield the best flowers, and they are also heavily sprayed with pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides. Because the flowers are grown in nations with more lax environmental laws, many banned substances including DDT and methyl-bromide are used in flower production. These substances have a profound impact on the health of the workers: many suffer from health problems such as skin conditions, respiratory problems, impaired vision, and birth defects thanks to their exposure to these chemicals.

In addition to hurting the workers, these chemicals are also extremely harmful for the environment. Methyl-bromide has been linked with destruction of the ozone layer, for example, while DDT usage worldwide led to serious problems for many animal and bird populations. Most greenhouses which produce cut flowers dump chemicals on their crops in large amounts. These chemicals later enter the bodies of workers, the flowers, and the ground water. Water pollution around commercial greenhouses hurts animal and fish populations and also has an impact on human life as well, by reducing the amount of drinkable water.

Once the flowers are grown, they still must be shipped to a final destination, greatly contributing to global pollution. Some cut flowers may be shipped thousands of miles, adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere at every step of the way. At the florist, the flowers are arranged and prepared for sale, and some florists have complained of skin and other health problems as a result of prolonged contact with cut flowers. Finally, the consumer brings the flowers home, perhaps tossing them carelessly into a shopping cart laden with organic, fair trade produce and other food stuffs.

The serious environmental impact caused by the cut flower industry began to raise eyebrows in the early twenty first century, when consumer advocacy organizations began to educate people about the problems with cut flowers. Usually, stories about flowers peak around Valentine's Day, in an attempt to convince consumers to buy organic, locally raised flowers which do not carry heavy environmental impacts with them. Local seasonal flowers can be just as handsome, and even more unusual, especially when combined with other thoughtful gifts.

All Things Nature is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a All Things Nature researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments
By BostonIrish — On Mar 02, 2011


I would argue that societal advancement and positive environmental practices go hand in hand. As the world grows to care for itself and people learn to treat fellow humans in a neighborly fashion, we will naturally be motivated to care for our environment and for the plight of future generations.

By BioNerd — On Feb 28, 2011


That's an interesting point you've made. I think that the process of helping the environment should certainly be prioritized as secondary to solving world hunger and diseases. As we progress forward toward helping the world to advance, it is important to recognize that many of these factories which are dumping pollutants are also the source of survival for many third world workers. Understanding that, we can then proceed to instruct businesses to be environmentally friendly, rather than eliminating them outright because of social stigma.

By anon138401 — On Dec 31, 2010

I doubt anyone will ever read this and if they do, I am sure it will be regarded as too great a thing to be true, but I assure you it is.

I strongly disagree with this writer. To be specific:

the comment about DDT. Not true and the news gets worse, much worse when you understand that, conservatively, at least 100,000,000 have lost their lives due to the discontinuation of DDT use.

This is the real history. Rachel Carson's book was the beginning of "environmental activism." It was the start of what I believe history will show to be nothing short of the largest genocidal act in history. Don't believe it? Read on.

When deaths each year of "between one and three million people, the majority of whom are (dark skinned) young children in sub-Saharan Africa" continue because someone once thought (incorrectly) that animals might be harmed, it is simply a crime.

How do you define genocide? Now, let's say you give us just a wee little break from your "environmental" preaching and agree that ignorance and arrogance are not really much of a defense for us first world people.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
All Things Nature, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All Things Nature, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.